The UN's Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, in his 2013 report on Canada to the UN Human Rights Council, noted that while "Canada has a duty to respect, protect and fulfil the right to food ... Canada does not currently afford constitutional or legal protection of the right to food." In such a rich country and province, this is embarrassing.
While the answer to hunger and food insecurity might appear to be food, it is not. It is a matter of income poverty and the need for adequate wages and welfare benefits.
The 2005 B.C. provincial health officer's annual report made this point, stating that the inability "to afford nutritious food in B.C. includes higher costs of a basic 'market basket' of items, higher housing costs, inadequate social assistance rates, increased levels of homelessness and a minimum wage level that can result in even full-time workers ... falling below the federal low-income cut-off." This analysis reflects federal and international data.
But while it is useful, it is also inadequate. It doesn't give an accurate sense of the visceral situation for people who have to decide whether to pay bills or buy food. Or people who are compelled to serve their kids pasta with ketchup instead of sauce. Many of us have known lean times. Not so many know what it's like to be consistently hungry due to our life circumstance.
What I don't see enough of at Hanukkah, Christmas, or any other time of year, however, are charities soliciting people to keep their coins, and instead offer real "change."
Because charities just can't keep up with the demand for their services. And if we awaken to the reality of this situation, maybe we'll also accept the fact that charity alone is never going to solve the structural problems that are woven into our communities.
This is an important problem with long term health and mental health consequences, and I know that food insecurity to this degree is both unacceptable and totally preventable. My work and the way I live my life has allowed me to see up close the consequences of food insecurity, and the immense effort parents living in poverty go to in order to try to make ends meet for their family.
"I was curious because I had no idea what a food bank was," he recalls. "They told me and I thought: Well, that's odd in the bread basket of the world and in a country with a well-developed social safety net."
Riches, retired in Qualicum Beach as Professor Emeritus and former director of the School of Social Work at the University of British Columbia, is one of the world's foremost experts on hunger and the right to food.
Food banks were created in the 1980s as an emergency response to hunger. By 2014 they are a permanent fixture, a parallel food system to the grocery store. Food is gathered at multiple locations, shipped, sorted, stocked and distributed. Countless paid and volunteer hours are devoted to this work, as well as work interviewing clients at intake, applying for funding and reporting on opportunities.
But back to the Turkey Drive. How does this outpouring of seasonal generosity affect food insecurity and the health of Islanders? It doesn't. It is a holiday tradition that has turned charity into necessity, and has become an entrenched need, rather than the emergency resource it was intended to be.
How, you might ask, could we possibly close them when so many people in our communities rely on them?
Well, as Put Food in the Budget (PFIB) reminds us in their latest discussion paper, "We Need to Talk - Who banks on food banks?," one way would be for the Ontario government to set social assistance and minimum wage rates high enough so that people could afford their own food.
"If people at the church think they're going to end poverty by volunteering at the food bank, they're not," said Put Food In The Budget provincial organizer Mike Balkwill. "If they think they're alleviating poverty, they're maybe alleviating a very small part of it."
But Dan Meades, provincial co-ordinator of the Transition House Association of N.L. and an anti-poverty advocate, wishes the focus was a little bit broader than what's on the shelves at the food bank.
Undoubtedly, food banks allow some hungry Canadians to be somewhat less hungry. But research shows that the majority of hungry Canadians never go to a food bank - and even those that do so are still hungry. This doesn't mean we need to donate more food to food banks. It means that we need to tackle the underlying problem, poverty.
Elaine Power
To put it bluntly, the CBC Turkey Drive should not exist.
I'm not being a curmudgeon or a Scrooge. I very much want everyone to have a Christmas (or Hanukkah) dinner they'll enjoy. But holding an annual food drive is way outside the mandate of the national broadcaster. And a more important point is that food banks are an extremely problematic response to hunger in our communities.
Yes, it is a good thing when we are able to help our fellow human beings, but it is not a good thing when we continue to put Band-Aids on what is a gaping wound of inequality.
Today's soup kitchens and food banks were created in the early 1980s to address food insecurity caused by the recession at the time. The original purpose of these services was as a temporary stopgap, but 30 years later, shouldn't we be questioning the length of the "emergency"?
We have now reached a point, thanks to the Harper brand of Thatcherism, where tax is a dirty word; thus, we have left the care of the hungry and the homeless to organized charities, and also to the churches.
The Hidden Epidemic: A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto, released last week by the Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto, calls the figures "shameful." Even worse, after dropping from 32 per cent a decade ago to 27 per cent in 2010, the numbers are rising again.
We're looking to find him an apartment in the GTA, preferably near the subway as he's currently going DT for counselling nearly every day, but Ontario Works only pays $376 a month for shelter. I've helped him apply to Toronto Community Housing but we were told to expect a three to five years wait.
This is one of the reasons why The Economist reversed its judgment of a decade ago and now labels us as, "Uncool Canada (The Moose Loses Its Shades)." Any nation, or its people, that continues to tolerate the proliferation of food banks in a world of financial abundance has clearly lost its appeal to the better angels of our nature.